TheoB needs to know what kind of evidence it is looking at.
A registry for peer-reviewed research, preprints, field-tested practice, lineage knowledge, expert opinion, market signals, internal experiments, and hype/noise.
Every TheoB pathway can move through Past, Present, and Future without losing context.
Read current signals, conditions, and live context.
Voice ready
Not all sources deserve the same confidence.
R&D Evidence & Source Quality Registry gives TheoB a way to classify research quality before discoveries enter scoring, experiments, claims, products, ceremonies, or system evolution.
Highest scientific credibility when relevant, recent, replicated, and interpreted carefully.
Useful early signal, but must be labeled provisional until reviewed or replicated.
Strong practical signal when results are documented, repeatable, and context is clear.
Valuable cultural and human knowledge that requires attribution, consent, context, and humility.
Useful directional guidance when expertise is clear, conflicts are disclosed, and claims stay bounded.
Shows demand or adoption, but does not prove truth, safety, ethics, or long-term value.
TheoB-generated learning from sandbox trials, prototypes, audits, and recovery simulations.
Low-trust signal that may be watched, archived, or rejected until evidence improves.
Truth work starts by naming the strength and limits of the source.
Evidence type must be labeled before a discovery receives high confidence.
Traditional knowledge should never be treated as ownerless data.
Market excitement is not proof.
Preprints and early claims require uncertainty labels.
Health, wellness, ceremony, and cacao claims require stricter evidence review.
Internal experiments should record method, result, limitation, and rollback memory.